Obama’s Evolving Christianity

Illinois State Senator Barack Obama in 2004 stating his opposition of same-sex marriage and belief that marriage isn’t a civil right:

Barack Obama in 2004 using Christianity as his basis for not supporting gay marriage:

“I’m a Christian. I do believe that tradition and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

Here now is President Barack Obama’s “evolving” in 2012:

“This is something that, you know, we’ve talked about over the years and (Michelle Obama), you know, she feels the same way, she feels the same way that I do. And that is that, in the end the values that I care most deeply about and she cares most deeply about is how we treat other people and, you know, I, you know, we are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated.

A well-meaning, but immature interpretation of the Golden Rule and of Christianity in general. When I think of the Golden Rule, it’s certainly not granting something that goes against basic Christian doctrine, as Obama himself asserted eight years ago.

Georgetown University Invites Pro-Abortion Catholic to Speak

It’s been a while since I’ve posted…May is my busiest month overall and posts will likely be limited for the next few weeks.

In the meantime, I saw this article on EWTN on Georgetown University inviting HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius to speak at a ceremony during the university’s commencement events this weekend. 

What’s the big deal? Well, it’s a Catholic university inviting a pro-abortion Catholic to speak at a campus event during a commencement weekend. Sebelius’ views on abortion aren’t a secret; she’s been banned from receiving Holy Communion by the Archbishop of Kansas City.

Also, remember that it was Georgetown University where a letter was written and signed by a group of faculty and staff condemning Rep. Paul Ryan’s Path to Prosperity budget plan as “misreading Church teaching” in its handling of entitlement programs and tax cuts. Now they’re inviting an open, pro-abortion Catholic, who is also in favor of forcing Catholics to violate their conscience and freedom of religion, to speak at a major campus event.

Like I mentioned in my Ryan post about 10 days ago, Georgetown University has a record of being soft and/or sympathetic (take your pick) with pro-abortion politicians. Talk about misreading Catholic teaching! Yet another reason Paul Ryan has no big reason to be concerned about criticism coming from these circles.

Cuba Travel Agency Firebombed

The facts behind the firebombing of a travel agency in Coral Gables that plans trips to Cuba, including for the recent papal visit, have yet to be sorted out. Obviously, the focus of speculation will be on extremists in the anti-Castro community. Assuming this was the deed of someone unhappy with the agency’s business, I believe it was the work of a single individual not acting as representative of the anti-Castro community. If that’s the case, let’s hope this individual or individuals is subject to the fullest extent of the law as quickly as possible.

Unfortunately, there will be those in our community who will quickly jump on this as another example of Cuban-American hardliner “intolerance” without bothering to understand the difference between disapproving of those who do business, directly or indirectly, with the Cuban regime and those commit criminal acts. Those folks are hardly worth of our attention in this case.

Path to Prosperity and Prudential Judgment

Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget plan has gotten lots of attention recently, including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops who expressed concerns with elements of the plan. It’s even gotten some lapsed liberal Catholics to utter the word “subsidiarity”, a step in the right direction even if most of these people are looking up the word just to bash Rep. Ryan over the head with. That’s OK. Baby steps.

I think it’s great that we’re having a serious discussion on how to solve our country’s huge budget problem. Rep. Ryan deserves a ton of credit for having the courage and leadership to initiate this discussion via his proposed plan, a plan that is far from perfect but is infinitely better than anything President Barack Obama, the man Americans elected in 2008 to address our budget woes and take firm steps to solve them, has been able to muster.

Folks are justified to be concerned about elements of Ryan’s plan. Mainly, it may be a little too ambitious/aggressive in its entitlement reform even though there’s little honest doubt that our entitlement programs as they exist today will totally fall apart within 20 years unless something is done. Those who criticize the plan because it hurts entitlement programs for the poor ought to consider this, even if they don’t agree with Ryan’s approach. Some argue that having only two tax brackets: 25 and 10 percent, cuts too much off the top although they fail to point out that the proposal to eliminate tax loopholes hurts top earners the most.

Rep. Ryan also deserves credit for not ducking from the heat. He appeared and spoke at Georgetown University shortly after the university’s faculty wrote a letter sharply criticizing the plan. Coming from a university that hasn’t always been a staunch defender of pro-life causes, it’s probably not a fatal blow to the representative from Wisconsin.

Here’s a term liberal Catholics ought to learn more about: prudential judgment. These well-intentioned folks who are jumping on the U.S. bishops’ bandwagon in criticism of Ryan’s plan should be mindful that no matter how one feels about the effectiveness of the plan for the most needy, Ryan is indeed applying an honest, rational and thoughtful interpretation of Catholicism into his plan.

Surely, criticize the plan’s flaws…but not because it isn’t “Catholic”. That’s just ridiculous, since the Catechism of the Catholic Church doesn’t include a section on devising the “official Catholic budget plan”. It’s here where I get irritated with the criticism from some circles. Those same circles that, when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable – innocent nascent life – hem and haw and talk a big game, but don’t follow through.

When it comes to abortion, there’s only ONE prudential judgement.

Cupp: Beat ‘Em at Their Game

S.E. Cupp gives Mitt Romney a little advice on how to handle President Obama in the presidential campaign:

Over the past few weeks, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has suddenly begun to defend his success, his family and even his wife’s decision to be a stay-at-home mom. In return, President Obama’s campaign and the media are crying foul. A lead sentence in a Politico piece on Monday said it all: “Meet Mitt Romney the victim.”

While it’s true that Romney finally appears to have realized that turning the other cheek works better as a proverb than a political strategy, he’s hardly the first of this election season to try to garner some sympathy from voters.

So as Romney mounts the fight of his life against Obama, he might want to rethink the victim strategy in favor of something that looks more like Obama’s elbow-throwing. Here’s a handy guide:

Don’t complain about the press. Intimidate it.

In 2008, during the final weeks of the presidential campaign, Obama had three reporters from conservative newspapers kicked off his plane. At the time, his adviser Anita Dunn said there simply wasn’t enough room for the three national journos who’d been covering the candidate all along. But somehow, writers from Glamour, Ebony and Jet magazines managed to find seats.

After he was elected, Obama also made the unprecedented move of trying to ban an entire network — Fox News — from the White House press pool. Luckily, the other networks objected and Fox kept its creds.

Still, the message was clear: You’re either with us or flying coach.

I wouldn’t go as far as using some of the dirty tactics the Democratic Party apparatus likes to employ, but it’s become more and more obvious that just playing nice and excusing your hard-earned success isn’t going to cut it. Defense doesn’t work in these type of elections. Attack Obama for his pitiful record, not his person.

Rep: West: “All of Us Born With Silver Spoon”

I’m not a big fan of Rep. Allen West’s bombastic way of getting his points across. At times, this approach doesn’t serve him or the conservative cause well because people focus on the style instead of on the substance.

However, Rep. West’s Facebook post yesterday in response to President Obama’s “silver spoon” criticism of Mitt Romney was spot-on in delivery and message:

President Barack Obama continues to display his lack of understanding the ideal of American exceptionalism. All Americans are born with a silver spoon. It is represented in the liberty, freedoms, and democracy this Constitutional Republic affords. It is in the unalienable individual rights granted to us by our Creator of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (property). It is the reason why so many have departed other countries to seek the silver spoon which provides equality of opportunity. Sadly, we are witnessing hope and change being replaced by divide and rule. God has blessed America with the silver spoon which we pass onto subsequent generations, honor that blessing.

I think Pres. Obama understands perfectly well. However, acknowledging and praising the wealthy doesn’t fit his party’s narrative. A narrative that seeks to divide rather than unite.

H/T: Babalu Val Twitter Feed

Do As I Say, Not As I Tweet

Twitter strikes again…this time exposing Rep. Keith Ellison for retweeting (i.e., agreeing with) a comment calling Mitt Romney a “heartless douchebag who doesn’t like animals or small children”.

Rep. Ellison, a.k.a. “Mr. Civility”, later took down the tweet. Figures. It cramps his style.

I totally expect decent liberals everywhere to denounce this type of boorish behavior by an elected official.

Catholic Bishop’s Strong Words Against Obama Administration

Whoa! Peoria, Illinois Bishop Daniel Jenky’s homily to the “A Call to Catholic Men of Faith” Mass this past Saturday may or may not “play beyond Peoria”, but if there’s anything to Peoria’s reputation as a testing ground for mainstream American culture, President Obama’s appeal among American Catholics may be at an irreversible low.

Bishop Jenky used a good portion of the homily to rail on the HHS contraception mandate. He used pretty strong and direct words, words that leave no doubt as to how he feels, and believes all Catholics should feel, about the issue:

In the late 19th century, Bismark waged his “Kultur Kamp,” a Culture War, against the Roman Catholic Church, closing down every Catholic school and hospital, convent and monastery in Imperial Germany.

Clemenceau, nicknamed “the priest eater,” tried the same thing in France in the first decade of the 20th Century.

Hitler and Stalin, at their better moments, would just barely tolerate some churches remaining open, but would not tolerate any competition with the state in education, social services, and health care.

In clear violation of our First Amendment rights, Barack Obama – with his radical, pro abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems intent on following a similar path.

Now things have come to such a pass in America that this is a battle that we could lose, but before the awesome judgement seat of Almighty God this is not a war where any believing Catholic may remain neutral.

This fall, every practicing Catholic must vote, and must vote their Catholic consciences, or by the following fall our Catholic schools, our Catholic hospitals, our Catholic Newman Centers, all our public ministries — only excepting our church buildings – could easily be shut down. Because no Catholic institution, under any circumstance, can ever cooperate with the instrinsic evil of killing innocent human life in the womb.

No Catholic ministry – and yes, Mr. President, for Catholics our schools and hospitals are ministries – can remain faithful to the Lordship of the Risen Christ and to his glorious Gospel of Life if they are forced to pay for abortions.

One can argue with Bishop Jenky as to whether President Obama is really following a path walked on by Stalin and Hitler and whether the comparison is truly just. That’s fair game. Perhaps the occasion – an annual men’s march in Peoria signaling a defense of the Catholic faith – lent itself to a “rallying cry” theme which was indulged upon by the bishop. I’m not familiar with him so I can’t say if this is consistent with his overall style and character.

What isn’t arguable, IMO, is the central theme of the homily which must be read in its entirety in order to grasp the context in which the above statements are made. The HHS contraception mandate may be only a small step, but it’s a step entirely in the wrong direction. A step that limits the religious freedom of individuals. Contraception and abortion-causing drugs aren’t “preventive medicine” aimed at improving one’s health. They’re not necessary to the maintenance and improvement of one’s health (if anything, they’re detrimental). It’s a legal choice that people are free to make and is easily available just about anywhere. It’s also something that the Catholic Church teaches as being wrong, for very good reasons. Forcing someone to choose between cooperating in materially providing for contraception against their conscience or not offering insurance and paying penalties – risking their livelihoods – is plain wrong. There’s no other way to state it.

All those Catholics in Congress who willingly support this measure – you know, the same ones who don’t take true stands against abortion – Bishop Jenky’s homily was directed right at you.

Another Victim of Over-Generalization

Over the weekend I took South Florida Daily Blog to task for failing to use key words to differentiate between “some” in a group and the group in general. Well, Miami-Dade Fire Captain Brian Beckmann was guilty of the same thing in a Facebook post last week, one which he is in hot water over.

(NOTE: I am not saying that Rick’s post over the weekend is guilty of the same racist insinuations, just guilty of similar over-generalizing).

Local 10′s Bob Norman accurately makes the point:

The definition of racism begins: “The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race …”. Key word: all. There’s no denying that there are deep problems in the black community that shouldn’t be ignored. But the real ignorance is to lump all members of any race together into one narrowly defined and hateful ball.

Yet one more reason why we should always be mindful of the words we use and don’t use. They matter.

It’s NOT About Race

You can usually count on Bill Cosby to provide a reasonable and thoughtful analysis to important issues. Case in point: his interview on CNN describing the Trayvon Martin case as being about guns and violence, not race. While his views about guns can be debated and discussed in a civilized manner with good points from both sides considered (Cosby’s own experience with guns is important to consider), at least he has the honesty and good sense to avoid falling into the “race trap” that so many are (purposely) falling into and instead focusing the issue on something that affects a wide range of Americans, regardless of race. For this I give him huge credit.

Video of the CNN interview can be viewed here.

BTW, on the issue of race: here’s a Bernie Goldberg post that will surely be viewed as “politically incorrect”. Not that it’s a bad thing in this case.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.